All Activity

This doesn’t make sense. R1 & R2 = north state R3 & R4 = south state The lower numbered regions in this scenario are 1 & 3

If you like the rotation instead of actual earned advantage, then it wouldn’t matter to you either way. I’d vote entire schedule to promote better matchups instead of cupcakes in the non-region. But that’s just me. I favor earned advantage based in real competition over a weak unearned advantage.

Morton will pass 90% of the time on basically 3 plays: 1 deep down the right sideline, 2 deep down the left side 3 slant in from the right side about a 8 to 10 yard pass.

It’s a very tough decision for the AD. I’d wager he has feelers out on who would be interested IF Lebby is let go. If the fans quit showing up for games and/or quit donating near as much… he really has no choice. It’s an SEC HC gig so it comes with prestige and obviously better pay than most jobs in college. On the other hand, the number of different HCs at MSU in so few years will likely make many candidates think twice about taking it. Roll the dice on a lower level HC, get a P4 OC OR DC wanting a head coach shot? Bring back Dan Mullen? IF the AD doesn’t make the right decision, his seat gets very hot too.

Lower numbered region hosts if both 1 seeds meet by rule this year which is region 2 and 4.

Nah. I like the rotation better. If you used strength of schedule would you use the entire schedule or region schedule only?

Marcus Sims steps down at Murrah in Jackson after 8 years.

State needed to start 3-0 and they’ve done so in pretty impressive fashion. I think it’s pretty obvious this team is more talented than what Jans had to work with last year. If there’s a clear concern it’s depth in the post, but my suspicion is you are about to see Reed replace Okafor in the starting lineup pretty soon, if the trend continues. Hoping that Reed had his breakout game tonight. Big neutral site game on Friday night against Xavier. 2004 revenge spot. Maybe the Musketeers won’t make approximately 40 threes this time.

They folded for those R4 coast teams. Never did for Tupelo/Oxford until they did it for the coasties and then had no more excuse to force it on Tupelo & Oxford

In these instances there should be an allowance for mileage. If the school doesn’t like the region assigned due to milage & it’s beyond a certain # of miles, then you give them the option to play up a class in a more local region. So then the school has a choice: play in your classification & assigned region… or play up a classification in a smaller radius. But making regions different sizes within a classification for no reason other than travel is wimpy.

Yes, I am familiar with how home field advantage and seeding works. The point is that since Gport and OG haven’t met head-to-head this season yet, if they were to meet in South State, you could look an ac actual football metric to break a tie between #1 seeds. You can use common opponents. The only differential there is Petal. One school beat them & the other did not. Given that factual basis there would be an actual metric used to grant one team an advantage based on actual football instead of just giving one team a leg up that’s not based in competition. I know that might not always be possible - if they were no common opponents - and then you could use strength of schedule. I’m advocating for teams to be rewarded based on actual football performance. Shocked anyone would try to make an argument against that.

State playing well tonight. Leading JSU 51-29 at the half. Defense has been excellent so far. Good depth, lot of guys off the bench playing well.

I get both sides. If he is fired, then here we go again. Just a revolving door of head coaches. If he is retained then you have a ton of frustrated fans who are tired of losing and who will be okay with losing some more with a new coach because what is the difference if you lose with your current coach or you lose with a new coach?

Qb, Wr and their defense. We have to be ready mentally and physically. I feel like we have the best team just some newbies oline got better last couple of games. Our offense still needs to catch up since Laurel game we haven't been the same.

I would say the same as last yr. Feaster at QB

Coach, what concerns y'all most about PRC? They'll probably play a lot harder this time.

HHS injured as well 3-4 players including Trey McQueen who been out for some games.

I agree that the ones calling the shots did not expect to lose to Vandy. Six wins with the QB situation, and they didn’t expect to have to make a big decision. I was told prior to last weekend “the people that matter” say he’s not being fired. Some people are more interested in “hanging out” with the head coach than the team being even halfway competitive. It will all come down to NIL support now. Those “people that matter” will find out the others matter more than they think.

after the season?

Except for 3A Region 4 in the playoffs traveling from Clarkdale to maybe Ripley or Meridian to the Tennessee line. 3A North should have been 6/6/4/4. 3A South should have been 6/6/5/5.

That is the week they have been playing unless they move it to play someone else that week.

He's gone I promise

Lebby's not beating Auburn and he's certainly not beating Ole Miss. If the chalk holds on his pending 3-22 SEC record, he will have the 2nd worst SEC winning percentage ever. How in the heck is that valid for employment retention?

I can see Tennessee Tech hanging with the Bulldogs. FCS or not 9-1 is pretty good

I think week 4 actually. Could be wrong