Jump to content

What wrong with Tupelo


Raiders 10
 Share

Recommended Posts

23 minutes ago, pancho said:

He figuring out the difference in 3A and 6A.   Much more scheme involved at this level.  He will either adjust or get eaten.

Houston is 4a not 3, but you're spot on. It's very, very difficult to out-athlete teams in 6a.

 

He will adapt I think, majority of the team are sophomores so it'll be interesting the next two years

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Arashatora said:

Houston is 4a not 3, but you're spot on. It's very, very difficult to out-athlete teams in 6a.

 

He will adapt I think, majority of the team are sophomores so it'll be interesting the next two years

They've done okay, just the last two teams were better... as will likely the next one as well - as you stated: they're pretty young this year.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, s1nglewing said:

They've done okay, just the last two teams were better... as will likely the next one as well - as you stated: they're pretty young this year.

 

30 minutes ago, Arashatora said:

Houston is 4a not 3, but you're spot on. It's very, very difficult to out-athlete teams in 6a.

 

He will adapt I think, majority of the team are sophomores so it'll be interesting the next two years

They had been 3A when hardin coached there and just moved to 4A this year.  He will adapt or be eaten in that division.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, MadisonReb10 said:

They were definitely out schemed on both sides of the ball.

So playing cover zero because of what they had on film but not being able to then adjust when the D begins to get toasted isn't a potential schematic adjustment?  It simply just is what it is at this time. As I stated prior, Tupelo will have to adjust or they will be eaten alive in this current region2 of 6A. I am not saying that they won't or that it's impossible to adjust. Maybe they do better next year and possibly have a better record due to playing certain teams on their home field.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tupelo is who they are. A usually slightly above average team. There were those three really good years recently, but other than those Tupelo has achieved at about the same level this century. To suggest that somehow they're not cutting the mustard suddenly is a red herring. They are 5-3, likely to end up 6-5 (or 7-4 with luck), which pretty much where Tupelo always is at the end of any given season, and then they'll make their obligatory first round exit.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, s1nglewing said:

Tupelo is who they are. A usually slightly above average team. There were those three really good years recently, but other than those Tupelo has achieved at about the same level this century. To suggest that somehow they're not cutting the mustard suddenly is a red herring. They are 5-3, likely to end up 6-5 (or 7-4 with luck), which pretty much where Tupelo always is at the end of any given season, and then they'll make their obligatory first round exit.


100% true. They should compete for a #1 seed every year, but always are struggling for #4.  There should be players wanting to move to Tupelo to be in that type of situation. 

Edited by MSTSatchmo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...